Glossary entry (derived from question below)
German term or phrase:
Auf den Grund geschaut
English translation:
Getting to the bottom of things
Added to glossary by
Terence Ajbro
Nov 21, 2008 12:09
15 yrs ago
2 viewers *
German term
Auf den Grund geschaut
German to English
Marketing
Ships, Sailing, Maritime
Unfortunately a headline that has to do with marine/maritime research. Googling brings lots of answers, but not conclusive.
Proposed translations
(English)
Change log
Nov 21, 2008 19:52: Steffen Walter changed "Field" from "Other" to "Marketing" , "Field (specific)" from "Linguistics" to "Ships, Sailing, Maritime"
Nov 26, 2008 07:57: Terence Ajbro Created KOG entry
Proposed translations
+6
2 mins
Selected
Getting to the bottom of things
one possible interpretation
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Ken Cox
: a nice option; there could be other ways to go, depending on the content. Headlines are always written after the content and should reflect the content.
35 mins
|
Thanks Ken
|
|
agree |
Inge Meinzer
1 hr
|
agree |
Ingeborg Gowans (X)
1 hr
|
agree |
babli
: agree
2 hrs
|
agree |
Rebecca Garber
4 hrs
|
agree |
Steffen Walter
: Good one.
7 hrs
|
Thanks Steffen
|
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
13 mins
Look at the bottom
Without any other context besides what is mentioned, this interpretation is the one that makes most sense to me.
53 mins
Straight from the ocean floor
oh well...
Peer comment(s):
neutral |
Ken Cox
: it came out of the deep ;-) (and made King Kong look like a lapdog)
1 hr
|
2 hrs
Looking at the fundamentals / back to the fundamentals
An attempt to render the pun...
How some other people have used it:
http://www.thepublican.com/story.asp?storyCode=59794
Financials, Geopolitics, or Fundamentals?
Having now breached US$95/b, a run on US$100/b now seems a distinct possibility even without any further geopolitical risks arising. Just last week Global Insight anticipated that a run on US$100/b would not be possible without further supply disruption, or the threat of disruptions, above and beyond the current risks posed by tensions on the Turkey-Iraq border and between the United States and Iran. The questions then are: what has changed in the market, and is the current rally being driven by fundamentals, geopolitics, or speculation?
Looking at the fundamentals, there is no question that the balance is tight. It has always been anticipated that the fourth quarter would see a sizeable inventory draw that would extend into the first quarter. In fact this is perfectly normal historically, though the scale of the draw this year is the worrying factor.
http://www.globalinsight.com/SDA/SDADetail10904.htm
I’m going to lean towards James Toney, but you never know; tough John Ruiz has been wining for the past three years so you can’t anything away from Ruiz, he’s very consistent, he stays strong throughout the fight. He has a lot of experience, but looking at the fundamentals I’m going to go with James Toney. He is a master at this game. He is very good and quick fundamental fighter, he is going to be in great shape.
http://www.doghouseboxing.com/Henderson/Henderson042005.htm
How some other people have used it:
http://www.thepublican.com/story.asp?storyCode=59794
Financials, Geopolitics, or Fundamentals?
Having now breached US$95/b, a run on US$100/b now seems a distinct possibility even without any further geopolitical risks arising. Just last week Global Insight anticipated that a run on US$100/b would not be possible without further supply disruption, or the threat of disruptions, above and beyond the current risks posed by tensions on the Turkey-Iraq border and between the United States and Iran. The questions then are: what has changed in the market, and is the current rally being driven by fundamentals, geopolitics, or speculation?
Looking at the fundamentals, there is no question that the balance is tight. It has always been anticipated that the fourth quarter would see a sizeable inventory draw that would extend into the first quarter. In fact this is perfectly normal historically, though the scale of the draw this year is the worrying factor.
http://www.globalinsight.com/SDA/SDADetail10904.htm
I’m going to lean towards James Toney, but you never know; tough John Ruiz has been wining for the past three years so you can’t anything away from Ruiz, he’s very consistent, he stays strong throughout the fight. He has a lot of experience, but looking at the fundamentals I’m going to go with James Toney. He is a master at this game. He is very good and quick fundamental fighter, he is going to be in great shape.
http://www.doghouseboxing.com/Henderson/Henderson042005.htm
Discussion